Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:55:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Atrox <silver.salonen@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Bacula wx-console's wx version Message-ID: <13208310.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! Does anyone see a reason why Bacula's wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in bacula-server's Makefile and it builds and works perfectly. I've also tried compiling it with 2.6 and there wasn't any problem with it neither. So what do you think - is the 2.4 really necessary there or would the WX-defaults suffice? -- Silver -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bacula-wx-console%27s-wx-version-tf4625066.html#a13208310 Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13208310.post>