From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Jul 18 12:16:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA10964
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 12:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roguetrader.com (brandon@cold.org [206.81.134.103])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA10945;
          Fri, 18 Jul 1997 12:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (brandon@localhost)
	by roguetrader.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA29713;
	Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:16:43 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:16:42 -0600 (MDT)
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@roguetrader.com>
To: John-David Childs <jdc@denver.net>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: upgrading to a safe BIND?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970718121827.388F-100000@milehigh.denver.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970718131613.29172B-100000@roguetrader.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, John-David Childs wrote:
> > work?  What differs between the bind distributed with FreeBSD and the bind
> > at isc.org?
> 
> I compiled 8..1.1 on FreeBSD 2.2.2 last week.  It compiles out of the box.
> THe primary differences are that FreeBSD puts some of the binaries in
> different places than isc does (e.g. /usr/bin vs. /usr/sbin) and that the
> isc man pages go in /usr/share/man/cat* instead of /usr/share/man/man*

Why don't we ship FreeBSD with bind-8?  From what I've read, it seems like
the better of the two..

-Brandon Gillespie