From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 22 3:33:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ddg.com (eunuch.ddg.com [216.30.58.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFBD37C05D for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 03:33:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rkw@dataplex.net) Received: from nomad.dataplex.net (24.28.73.209) by mail.ddg.com with SMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.1); Wed, 22 Mar 2000 05:33:54 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth To: Fabrizio Poggi Subject: Re: Voxware is toast. Get used to it. (Re: Suggestions for impro Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 05:26:12 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain References: <00032119450200.18784@nomad.dataplex.net> <3.0.5.32.20000322120150.00920100@infos1.casaccia.enea.it> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000322120150.00920100@infos1.casaccia.enea.it> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00032205335100.01108@nomad.dataplex.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Fabrizio Poggi wrote: > At 09.45 22/03/00 -0000, you wrote: > > suggestion : > > > > 3.X -SOLID > > 4.X -STABLE > > 5.X -CURRENT > > > > OK, so it's a daft idea. > > That it seems better than stable/release/current. "-RELEASE" is not a state. It is a point in time. The other terms refer to the continuum between releases. I still think that "current" is misleading to newbies and should be called "development". > It is possible from this > mailing list launch suggestion for the development team? I don't think so. It seems that "its their sand box" and they really don't care how unfriendly their practices are to mere "users" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message