From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 16:16:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988F1DCE for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-057.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204AF2A3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from i7-quad-PC.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-142.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.142]) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0OGFg19072119; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:15:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20130124101025.069e9900@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:15:33 -0600 To: Anton Yuzhaninov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona Subject: Re: IPMI SOL setup on FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20130121123250.067f3158@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: r0OGFg19072119 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:16:02 -0000 At 09:07 AM 1/23/2013, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: >On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:52:17, Derek Ragona wrote: >DR> I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro >X9SCM-F/X9CL-F >DR> motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right. >DR> >DR> These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a dedicated IPMI >interface. >DR> >DR> I have both servers configured to use the dedicated IPMI NIC and these >DR> NIC's are plugged into a separate unmanaged switch. >DR> >DR> Both systems boards are set to redirect com1. I changed /etc/ttys to >run a >DR> getty on /dev/ttyu0. I have com1 configured to 115,200 baud, 8, n, 1, no >DR> flowcontrol in the BIOS. I in have /etc/ttys: >DR> ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure > >/etc/ttys: >ttyu1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure > >/boot/loader.conf: >hint.uart.0.flags="0" >hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" >boot_serial="YES" >boot_multicons="YES" >comconsole_speed="115200" >console="comconsole vidconsole" Anton, Thanks for answering. I thought: >/etc/ttys: >ttyu1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure is for com2? I also thought: hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" Is for com2? you said: hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" Is that for for a serial only console? I read in some posts, to use: hint.uart.1.flags="0x30" for both a local console with a serial console. I could not find much documentation on the uart or sio flags. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.