Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:09:30 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Subject: Re: [CFR] Remove texinfo from base Message-ID: <E6402E7B-7490-406A-B973-4642D590F040@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20140625154758.GD23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140625103107.GB23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625104540.GE86779@over-yonder.net> <20140625105209.GC23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625110049.GF86779@over-yonder.net> <40EA1066-4776-4B2E-988A-9900BB842862@bsdimp.com> <20140625154758.GD23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_788F477C-A05C-439A-9B5A-6DA1B3145878 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> = wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:20:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 4:00 AM, Matthew D. Fuller = <fullermd@over-yonder.net> wrote: >>=20 >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:52:10PM +0200 I heard the voice of >>> Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus: >>>>=20 >>>> I have just committed the support for this in ports, anyway = breakage >>>> should be reported, right now it seems fine on my exp-run >>>=20 >>> Oh, yes. Sorry, I did phrase that poorly. This shouldn't _break_ >>> anything, but I suspect it will uncover existing-but-hidden = breakage. >>>=20 >>> Which is good. But does merit awareness that "hey, this will = probably >>> happen somewhere, so know this is a place to look when a build >>> breaks". >>=20 >> I know it will break certain nanobsd configurations that build ports = because >> dependencies there (at least for the ones I=92ve done) aren=92t well = handled. So >> I agree that this patch is missing, at the very least, an UPDATING = entry and >> a __FreeBSD_version bump. >=20 > If you build a port that needs texinfo the port framework will do what = it needs Except in environments that don=92t do dependencies quite right, or = where only a subset of ports tree has been imported and texinfo isn=92t part of that=85 But = people with them usually know, which is why UPDATING is needed. That=92s all. There=92s = nothing else for you to do. Warner --Apple-Mail=_788F477C-A05C-439A-9B5A-6DA1B3145878 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTqvQ6AAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEAX6EQAKIhsFfHmnnNxZgoWB+GFIuF IJwVq2TSL1+InLufCcQcxsWvHfqDEcR5oDTgdjMTdrf9S1PTiMtHYP8TYoPMivjN U1iWtJfDdMSEQkk5t449TU+m4q7YqV9FZh2rx2MSXQ2E8fRbX2HhUl1p+PZPcEwF coPV2caY04LYhgyoE08a/S7nsQ1jm1hO1KrWjzaftr7CPWuvxjmZEQv4sunyU9kB MhrE5m0rV31n40sAuayduzfRWEesbwwLLtM5FK167nuX0JAW5GSEKeKt16ar9eQR nHV/yHWPc8yVlm/cY5NGp20BW4TxAmRaKoi4Yx3JYg8jyKCHP+Ahery65j2I5Eht y1qQta/StmD2hXNsdVzQAD72K3829zuadN4fdyvxDhXW3ckglMoCiPfUtTt82Cvk xBaHb1pvKIbKfFx61XiVVwzWtYClY6VB7+jF6RjHTLQo3mmHfFgvdTPJMPi8Cmgg b2uB+9lEpDYG5O0YdwLlwG2m5FufU/BmTtDEcC4BMok+vL8q3mqU8YftHX7pLdQE l+tvXUdm5w63Kp0DnpSh11AsVtPcOSQEqXuoq5cxIwBwp9Fh3lPntgEzKze552l2 1EBGR2+2ieCbekqggcHUsa32k4U+iZ2f3Mf4oRFyQkNp18exAXPbBOE9S6Ce6nkd 1BhFyGNJBRbsf7S9D8sj =D/gg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_788F477C-A05C-439A-9B5A-6DA1B3145878--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E6402E7B-7490-406A-B973-4642D590F040>