From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 23:00:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433A0EB59C8 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 23:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03CA7733DF for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 23:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id e1so11618866ita.0 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:00:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=N8n8hKIE/s93LGpF+0iDd6HcbKoo7keqLoQ2tZAVDGo=; b=bQSIjaeTTWUxIcSTrDwhZTF/jO9vLKmS7oyoNdiCzpKNVTqKcxA7CcfyFyoR+MArkx HbZdbeyJ2aS2phu3I5oUHnCFMa2VeM3C7Z+CO0Z9K62Cl2rVfxH8N/sNio1E5PR0fx4D eRFAh/EQLRafcD3l3AQMcw0J/gvwv8XCB6cvvXQAXXrlg0a+IlGTisWFvZLMZaSVrNYk 3OvY2L01q/f00Hk0SLwJWxemdCbkYCSxj2BA2tSxDpLdM/a+UE2d5Mf+BAgsyHGT29J2 umNGDA1277+5nzHF5Yx80+vcWKazZgqiK65JYtdO+TZaSPt3kJXn03aLRljCwt7W7TyY GrOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=N8n8hKIE/s93LGpF+0iDd6HcbKoo7keqLoQ2tZAVDGo=; b=uLptW9H1dH1bJcP2YzVG12ADXEnMfVSdj7LnpaXXLZH803F3Mjeg66IaZPpjRmc67t z/OJZbONXkuraI7009kqnKUjW9lJO7j5TXt6+F8jCEO3GLRGsSl324H1O8LK1vo31ukc wghwR5+MPqebdBUdKNynGCVW/Ym97xVS4LXwvPh+qfkBmkUSuMaSbFJaS0/MfQQphjj3 FueaJlVZOYt7WaTk30DnNEmA60JN3rZcgpXBfa32ISWoEEYthvLS/SH0j2+NZ5nhXmve uZN8hC3dq5Ug7x/KVcyPyxECyxyj5bmpRkhhBeqLJVsZkAnKy0las6A3wi5EjsY+9tbD 4zFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytePzR+cnG/Zp/evLqpkEHCkcKHHPgyWx7YMcVHFw1XwHC14iCkG z0AX4CDsmQHtvIqafA/CrgXlMfiyAAz4jWA9mvPzog== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224NSlSzWTiDeTlR8v77xtrdhieTHz0u47wLAHqG++G/sav0cl4s0pXvFbcR5KvwQdl50Oi5PGfU4M/b90NVReU= X-Received: by 10.36.74.200 with SMTP id k191mr782733itb.69.1516662031199; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:00:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by 10.79.201.67 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:00:27 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [50.253.99.174] In-Reply-To: <607B50C2-883C-4CAB-8860-483EC4E9A668@mac.com> References: <201801220710.w0M7AUm9091853@repo.freebsd.org> <88258.1516630050@critter.freebsd.dk> <20180122153003.664e1613bbf70ab49c5c1541@bidouilliste.com> <52374125.OgxafgljNu@ralph.baldwin.cx> <89102.1516649067@critter.freebsd.dk> <607B50C2-883C-4CAB-8860-483EC4E9A668@mac.com> From: Warner Losh Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:00:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CFZ7uwNsZZtD0VgLnpcveev73jU Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r328257 - in head/sys: arm/broadcom/bcm2835 dts/arm modules To: Ravi Pokala Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , John Baldwin , Emmanuel Vadot , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 23:00:32 -0000 On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Ravi Pokala wrote: > >> I wonder if it would be too noisy if we allowed ->probe() to run on > disabled devices and reported something like: > >> > >> "foobar0: Matched disabled device <...>" > >> > >> (without calling ->attach()) > >> > >> That way you would know you loaded the right driver, rather than have > to guess > > > > I suspect that would be too noisy. It would be better to just run probe, > but then have newbus report it's disabled so we never go onto attach. > > I think a "Matched disabled device" message under bootverbose would be > reasonable. > I think even bootverbose it's insane. Or I don't understand what the real ask is. Warner