Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:13:08 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Da Rock <rock_on_the_web@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: what happened to linuxflashplugin? Message-ID: <20080212091214.G2271@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <BAY143-W290238DBF97CFF4BE20E1D8D2B0@phx.gbl> References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <20080211211052.X5691@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47B0AF73.6030901@chuckr.org> <200802112304.09906.jonathan%2Bfreebsd-questions@hst.org.za> <20080211211428.GA50577@aleph.cepheid.org> <20080211223155.C6199@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47B0CDA1.9060801@student.utwente.nl> <47B14C06.2020101@pacific.net.sg> <20080212083740.K2068@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <BAY143-W290238DBF97CFF4BE20E1D8D2B0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This of course doesn't help them if their web designer can't fix the design issue, which is why it would be an issue in the first place. Or the designer will say its ok- show statistics which are becoming rapidly outdated and say its only a minority. they could simply pay other web designer, good are often more cheap not expensive ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080212091214.G2271>