From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 02:30:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A900016A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 02:30:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C9943D67 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 02:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i872UOwU016592 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 02:30:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i872UOVH016591; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 02:30:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 02:30:24 GMT Message-Id: <200409070230.i872UOVH016591@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Matthias Andree Subject: Re: kern/71424: user-ppp broken again - maybe xl(4) or ng_* bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Andree List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 02:30:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/71424; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthias Andree To: Gleb Smirnoff Cc: Matthias Andree , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/71424: user-ppp broken again - maybe xl(4) or ng_* bug? Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 04:26:44 +0200 On Mon, 06 Sep 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Isn't this duplicate of kern/69133 ? No it isn't. kern/69133 is about the interface or netgraph not seeing the data packets if autonegotiation on the xl(4) interface is enabled (default setting), this is about user-ppp not getting the proper netgraph node type and aborting before even trying to communicate. > MA >5-CURRENT was fine recently > > What do you mean? Post kern/69133 CURRENT was fixed for some time? > Can you give at least approximate dates? No, the problem in kern/69133 has apparently persisted, but I worked around it by forcing the xl1 interface to 10baseT/UTP as written in PR #69133. I was about to re-check if the problem persisted in BETA3 but found out that it now fails even earlier, before we get to the point where we might see problem #69133. Hence this new report. I'll quote the interesting part again, watch the "Unexpected node type" and Failed to open device: > M> ppp[885]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish > M> ppp[885]: tun0: Phase: deflink: closed -> opening > M> ppp[885]: tun0: Warning: xl1: Unexpected node type ``'' (wanted ``ether'') > M> ppp[885]: tun0: Chat: Failed to open device > M> ppp[885]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Enter pause (30) for redialing. -- Matthias Andree