From owner-freebsd-bluetooth@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 4 09:00:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C51610656AB for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 09:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plunky@rya-online.net) Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com (smtp5.freeserve.com [193.252.22.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8818FC1F for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 09:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plunky@rya-online.net) Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com (mwinf3419 [10.232.11.119]) by mwinf3405.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3C99D1C00374 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:38:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3419.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4A6BB1C00083; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:38:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rya-online.net (unknown [89.193.221.218]) by mwinf3419.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 993F51C00081; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:38:34 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20090704083834627.993F51C00081@mwinf3419.me.freeserve.com Received: (nullmailer pid 593 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:38:35 -0000 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 09:38:35 +0100 (BST) To: Daniel O'Connor In-Reply-To: <200907041530.00723.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200907041530.00723.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (NEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <1246696715.277289.590.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> From: Iain Hibbert Cc: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Subject: Re: btpand uses a lot of CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Using Bluetooth in FreeBSD environments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:00:25 -0000 On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I have btpand working OK, however I notice that it uses a lot of CPU > (20-70% of a Pentium-M 1.4GHz) even when idle. > > hcidump doesn't show any untoward activity and I'm not sure how to go > about debugging it.. perhaps it is looping? You could build it with -DEVENT_DEBUG and enable LOG_DEBUG messages in syslogd.conf that might show more information.. iain