From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Nov 21 09:06:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA21946 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 09:06:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from super.zippo.com (perry.zippo.com [207.211.168.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA21940 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 09:06:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reyesf@super.zippo.com) Received: (from reyesf@localhost) by super.zippo.com (8.8.6/8.8.7) id JAA18286; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 09:06:34 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711211706.JAA18286@super.zippo.com> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Fri, 21 Nov 97 12:08:01 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Francisco Reyes's Registered PMMail 1.9 For OS/2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Is there a FreeBSD benchmark program? Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I recently saw a message about someone upgrading from 2.2-stable to 2.2.5 and having serious performance degratation. I was wondering if there was any benchmark program for FreeBSD. This may help both users and kernel developers on checking whether a new kernel or configuration is better.