Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:20:50 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: freebsd@chillt.de Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE Message-ID: <20061103.092050.71105133.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <453D1419.8080009@chillt.de> References: <453D1419.8080009@chillt.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@chillt.de> Subject: [PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:12:25 +0100 > Hi > > I have just upgraded from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4 and compilation broke for me on > three separate accounts. All three were manifestations of the same error > in OO.o's source: The keyword "NULL" is used to denote a null pointer, > which is legal in C but not in C++. The number "0" should be used > instead. I am surprised that nobody else seems to have run into this. > Maybe my gcc is more picky about standards for some reason? Either way, > if anybody else encounters this problem, trivial patches that fix it are > attached. this is http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71039 . you supplied three patches binfilter/inc/bf_svx/svdobj.hxx sc/source/ui/inc/csvcontrol.hxx svx/inc/svdobj.hxx and in #i71039#, following patches are provided binfilter/inc/bf_svx/svdobj.hxx svx/inc/svdobj.hxx as Caolan doesn't include following patch sc/source/ui/inc/csvcontrol.hxx how do you think? do you need this patch? -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061103.092050.71105133.chat95>