From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 22:02:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA9F16A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:02:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FBE43D48 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:02:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j56M2Y52022840; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.153] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j56M2WF9010283; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <42A48EF5.10408@t-hosting.hu> References: <42A48EF5.10408@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:02:36 -0400 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arplookup failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:02:37 -0000 On Jun 6, 2005, at 1:59 PM, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > The following message has been often repeating in my messages log: > > Jun 6 19:24:38 server kernel: arplookup =20 > failed: host is not on local network > > I know what arp is, and I understand this message, but I don't know =20= > what causes it, but it annoys me, and I'd like to remove it from my =20= > log, since it doesn't make any severe error, and I would like =20 > compendious log files. Do You have any idea? It generally means that one or more of your hosts do not agree on =20 what the subnet mask should be. You should look into and fix this =20 problem; layer-2 problems can result in remarkable and unexpected =20 network behavior sometimes... --=20 -Chuck