From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 02:38:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE514106564A; Thu, 31 May 2012 02:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B6D14E124; Thu, 31 May 2012 02:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FC6D9B6.5090603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:38:46 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120506 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew D. Fuller" References: <4FBA618A.1050707@freebsd.org> <20120521155736.GA79323@DataIX.net> <4FBA6FEB.1000706@quip.cz> <4FC45D40.4060200@FreeBSD.org> <4FC4AC34.70902@acsalaska.net> <4FC501F9.8080304@FreeBSD.org> <4FC514AF.4040000@FreeBSD.org> <4FC519E0.5070909@FreeBSD.org> <20120529190835.GA63113@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20120529190835.GA63113@over-yonder.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olli Hauer , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 02:38:47 -0000 On 05/29/2012 12:08, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:48:00AM -0700 I heard the voice of > Doug Barton, and lo! it spake thus: >> The whole concept of category/portname where there are multiple >> versions of portname is flawed. The DEFAULT_PORTNAME_VER mechanism >> works just fine, especially for dependencies. > > The disadvantage though is that we need to grow and use b.p.m > infrastructure then for every port we start handling multiple versions > of. No, only for those ports that are depended on, where multiple versions can be used to fulfill a dependency. The full-blown infrastructure would only be needed in this case. For leaf ports (ala bind*) it's not needed at all, and for other depended ports (ala libtorrent-rasterbar*) where only one version is suitable (or desirable) for the leaf it's not necessary. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection