From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Sep 7 19:57:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D9F37B422 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 19:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C2E161C71; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:57:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:57:23 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: "Eric P. Scott" Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO_TCSH issue Message-ID: <20000907225723.U33771@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200009080254.TAA52210@mail1.sirius.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200009080254.TAA52210@mail1.sirius.com>; from eps@sirius.com on Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:54:17PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:54:17PM -0700, Eric P. Scott wrote: > What individuals choose as defaults for their personal accounts > is their business. I don't see a problem with having sh, ksh, > zsh, bash, csh, tcsh, _whatever_ available. But I stand by my > opinion that replacing csh with tcsh in 4.1-RELEASE was the > single most ill-conceived action taken by the committers. I'd argue that allowing posts from your domain is currently holding that position. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message