From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 30 19:47:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA02346 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02304 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [204.178.32.161]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA06363 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 10:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA20132; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:55:41 -0400 (EDT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: Warner Losh cc: John Capo , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2.X ping -l == ping -f In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Warner, Sorry, sorry, sorry, I thought the machine I was on was up-to-date, but it wasn't... My bad. Charles On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Warner Losh wrote: > In message spork writes: > : I do like the side-effect this produces; namely, joe user can't do a > : "pseudo ping-flood" by setting a huge preload. > > That was the intended effect. > > : 2.1.7.1 allows a big preload value, which I didn't care for... > > Yuck. I thought I had back ported it. Are you asking for this to be > placed into the 2.1 stable branch? > > Warner >