From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Mar 11 8:11:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068C837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:11:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2BGBGn61059; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200103111611.f2BGBGn61059@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: david@catwhisker.org, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -CURRENT OK; -STBALE (4.3-BETA) not for D-Link DFE-650? In-Reply-To: <200103110244.f2B2ilH59627@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 18:44:47 -0800 (PST) >From: David Wolfskill In my haste yesterday, I made a couple of mistakes, with the result that nothing I was writing about was worth posting to this (or any other) list; sorry. >Sorry; I can't get to the FreeBSD Web site to check the archives; >I'm able to ping freefall & traceroute to it, but the Web server >doesn't appear to be responding. That was a result of a loss of a default route. >.... >while in today's -CURRENT, it works fine: >The kernel configs are as similar as I can make them; here's a diff of a >normal (non-verbose) dmesg output: Except that the -CURRENT kernel had the "ed" device defined, while neither -STABLE kernel did. Amazing what defining the device can do for the ability to use it. My apologies to anyone affected, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message