Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:07:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Message-ID:  <20050131120605.C8759@carver.gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20050130130011.A9B0D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
>             Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> : Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?
>
> Most likely historical inertia...  No body noticed until that module
> build got more facist.

The digi driver in HEAD is completely inoperative anyway, so removing it
from the kernel config wouldn't hurt anyone, for the time being.

(There's a PR with a fixed driver I'm trying to find time to test...)

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050131120605.C8759>