From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 31 20:07:02 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E2B5A16A4CE; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:07:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CB37043D45; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:07:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B39CC72DD4; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B8172DCB;
	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:07:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20050131120605.C8759@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <20050130130011.A9B0D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
cc: scottl@FreeBSD.org
cc: tinderbox@FreeBSD.org
cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:07:03 -0000

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
>             Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> : Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?
>
> Most likely historical inertia...  No body noticed until that module
> build got more facist.

The digi driver in HEAD is completely inoperative anyway, so removing it
from the kernel config wouldn't hurt anyone, for the time being.

(There's a PR with a fixed driver I'm trying to find time to test...)

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org