Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jan 1996 12:00:12 -0500
From:      dennis@etinc.com (dennis)
To:        hm@altona.hamburg.com
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Multi-Port Async Cards
Message-ID:  <199601281700.MAA09533@etinc.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>From the keyboard of dennis:
>
>> the AST solution is unacceptable for a real ISP....I wonder why the cyclades
>> board needs mgetty.....whats the major diff between getty and mgetty?
>
>As far as i understood it the situation is like this: the 2.1 driver has
>some (please correct me if i'm wrong !!) problems and so Brian Litzinger
>(sp?) wrote a replacement driver. This driver needs a) a hardware
>modification in the plugs and b) need mgetty because the interlock between
>incoming and outgoing calls is not done in the driver (so it must be done
>with mgetty). a) and b) are not acceptable for my purposes.
>
>Someone else wrote that the -current Cyclades driver works fine. Has someone
>backported the diffs to 2.1 or -stable yet ?
>
>Are there any _first-hand_ 2.1/-stable experiences with any Cyclades driver ?

Which cyclades driver is this ( I understand they have multiple boards)? Has
anyone
seen (or touched) their new PCI board?

Dennis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emerging Technologies, Inc.      http://www.etinc.com

Synchronous PC Cards and Routers For Discriminating
Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, 
and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601281700.MAA09533>