Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:27:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: interfaces, routes, etc. Message-ID: <199607192027.NAA00425@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199607191512.LAA27956@etinc.com> from "Dennis" at Jul 19, 96 11:12:47 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >It wouldn't be hard to modify "route" to accept either type of > >argument... the question is, does the kernel store interface > >routes using the actual address or using a pointer to the interface? > > You have to do it without trashing the "gateway" concept of passing > info to devices. What do you mean exactly? I'm not that familiar with it. Maybe passing a gateway of 0.0.0.0 could be an acceptable value for those interfaces that don't need to know... -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie L. Cobbs, archie@whistle.com * Whistle Communications Corporation
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607192027.NAA00425>