From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 12:44:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A6DEA1 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D8864B10 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t02CiM3t024579; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:44:22 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:44:22 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Claude Buisson Subject: Re: COMPAT_FREEBSD8 [was: Re: IPSec and racoon issue...] In-Reply-To: <54A6820D.503@free.fr> Message-ID: <20150102232655.O82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <620F82BB-1D53-4F2A-9C67-51D5EC3C3144@lists.zabbadoz.net> <7A7DD8BC-D990-4C6A-8452-F8336ECB7D08@lists.zabbadoz.net> <0717155F-4247-467A-A37D-FF1F34104403@orthanc.ca> <20150102150945.P82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <54A6820D.503@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:44:30 -0000 On Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:33:33 +0100, Claude Buisson wrote: > On 01/02/2015 05:49, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > Thanks to the magic of symbol versioning, I don't think there has a > > COMPAT_FREEBSD8 or COMPAT_FREEBSD9. With luck and care, there should never > > be one again. > > Have a look at sys/conf/NOTES in -head, to find: > > COMPAT_FREEBSD9 > COMPAT_FREEBSD10 > > added by r273603 on Oct 24 > > but no COMPAT_FREEBSD8 Interesting, thanks guys. Maybe 8 and 9 come to the same thing in this respect. FWIW, pascal binaries built on 8.2 i386 run fine on 9.3 amd64, but mine are just maths and file I/O. Not sure why I was surprised .. cheers, Ian