From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 20 16:19:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA16457 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from expo.x.org (expo.x.org [198.112.45.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA16452 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:18:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from exalt.x.org by expo.x.org id AA05249; Wed, 20 Mar 96 19:18:25 -0500 Received: from localhost by exalt.x.org id AAA04369; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:18:24 GMT Message-Id: <199603210018.AAA04369@exalt.x.org> To: Angelo Turetta Cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GAS question In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:35:39 EDT. Organization: X Consortium Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 19:18:23 EDT From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Which SDK? I know for a fact that the (now two and a half year old) > > Windows NT 3.1 Win32 SDK had the C compiler on it. > > That is not exact. Only the BETA Win32 SDK CDs used to include the C = > compiler. (they were forced to do so, otherwise I can't imagine how = > developers could have tested the SDK ? :-) > From the moment NT was released, the compiler was stripped from the SDK = > and became a stand-alone product. At the risk of beating a dead horse, it is "exact." The Windows NT 3.1 Win32 SDK I have does have the C compiler on it and it is *not* a beta. -- Kaleb KEITHLEY