From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 15 06:43:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F65106564A; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from k7.mavetju.org (ppp113-58.static.internode.on.net [150.101.113.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC25A8FC0C; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by k7.mavetju.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 70F5C450C8; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:43:45 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:43:45 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20090615064345.GA98056@mavetju.org> References: <200906150217.n5F2HA9C076656@svn.freebsd.org> <20090615062346.Q22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090615062346.Q22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r194231 - head/share/timedef X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:43:47 -0000 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:34:23AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > Undo the change in r193688 as suggested in conf/72076. > > > > People on IRC and the -doc mailinglist (June 2009) showed that this > > new format wasn't used or known widely enough to justify the change. > > grml; it is but people have been ignorant for ages now, still using DIN > 1355; > not sure we want to encourage this anymore:( > > What follows is from the top of my head: > > ISO8601 - from 198x[x=8|9]/1991 > EN28601 - from 1992 > DIN5008 - from 2001 > > In contrast to that DIN1355 imho was fomm 194x, changed at least 1975 > and I think they did something mid-90s after EN28601 was out. > > Imho since 2005 or 2006 ISO8601 is authoritative. Grab your asbestos underpants and re-commit the change :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/ edwin@mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/