From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 1 19: 4:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from radon.gryphonsoft.com (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEDE37B422; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 19:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by radon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31A53198A; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:01:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:01:58 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: Will Andrews , Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal: PORTREVISION and PORTEPOCH Message-ID: <20000901210157.C589@radon.gryphonsoft.com> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , Will Andrews , Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000828202407.N73638@radon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000828205253.Q73638@radon.gryphonsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:45:11PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:45:11PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > How about this one? I reimplemented Kris' patch to not use nested > .if's. This implementation is acceptable. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message