Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 13:32:04 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Wes Peters - Softweyr LLC <softweyr@xmission.com> Cc: allen@xmission.xmission.com, campbell@xmission.xmission.com (Chris Campbell), allenc@verinet.com, config@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Config Databases Message-ID: <1937.893363524@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:24:43 MDT." <199804232024.OAA18834@xmission.xmission.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Keep in mind that the configfs can return whatever error necessary; I know, but deciding *which errors* to return could consume a lot of time. I really do think one would save a considerable amount of time and contraversy by simply implementing it as I suggested. Some errno returns *will* suggest themselves so obviously that there's no reason not to return them (ENOENT certainly being one :-), but I'd just shy completely away from the whole "I/O error" class and just write that off as something to grapple with (maybe, haha) in the 2nd version. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-config" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1937.893363524>