From nobody Mon Sep 20 21:18:19 2021 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7539C175A105 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HCy8W2pVNz3Fv1 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA34174F4 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 18KLIJI3051800 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 18KLIJ3L051799 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258527] wpa_supplicant(8) from the base is not able to bring up wlan(4) interface correctly due to SIGSEGV after EAP/PEAP MSCHAPv2 authentication Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cy@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258527 Marek Zarychta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Some People |Affects Only Me --- Comment #16 from Marek Zarychta --- We should all take it easy, it is a minor breakage and probably no other se= tups except mine are affected. On the other hand, the security/wpa_supplicant fr= om ports still works as intended. The QA process takes some time, the same for debugging and writing patches,= but also taking dumps and testing patches requires some time and effort includi= ng either driving tens of miles or recreating EAP/PEAP secured network in the = home lab.=20=20 I have no insight into @freebsd.org e-mail server setup, but believe it does some false positives marking messages as SPAM what makes writing direct ema= il messages a bit hopeless. The first conclusion: "no other setups are probably affected" is pretty sad= and means that FreeBSD's user base became FreeBSD's consumer base. I have repor= ted this breakage a week or two ago on the net@ mailing list and there was no feedback at all. The FreeBSD consumer base utilizes probably only RELEASEs = and cares neither for the development process nor for the quality of the upcomi= ng product. The final question which comes here is: Do we really need wpa_supplicant in= the base? I was against ftpd(8) removal which IMHO is an imminent part of the FreeBSD OS, but wpa_supplicant can be easily installed from ports. Consumers who have only WiFi access can have the package on the USB stick. Kind regards,=20 FreeBSD User --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=