From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue Oct 27 20:55:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA19046 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 20:55:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA19041 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 20:55:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.9.1/8.7.3) id VAA21943; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 21:47:54 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 21:47:54 -0700 (MST) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199810280447.VAA21943@narnia.plutotech.com> To: Graeme Tait cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CAM question 3.0-RELEASE X-Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.scsi In-Reply-To: <3636A466.5222@echidna.com> User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980818 ("Laura") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.0-BETA (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <3636A466.5222@echidna.com> you wrote: >> This is normal. The system tries to figure out how many tags each unit >> can support by experimentation and observation. Some disks are >> broken here and have to be quirk'd to turn off or reduce tags. > > Is there some reason why these messages are desirable and need to be on by > default? They help us (the SCSI developers) diagnose problems. They also give the user an idea of the capabilities of their hardware. > They certainly get annoyingly voluminous at times. The following comment > is from the freebsd-scsi archives: They will stop as soon as the minimum tag count is achieved. Do you reboot your system all the time or something? -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message