From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 5 17:55:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D07106564A for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDD18FC14 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 17:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-118-129.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.118.129]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC361E707; Wed, 5 May 2010 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o45HtiSX001688; Wed, 5 May 2010 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 19:55:44 +0200 From: Polytropon To: krad Message-Id: <20100505195544.be380d17.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: dangerously dedicated disks and 8-stable status X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 17:55:46 -0000 On Wed, 5 May 2010 17:17:09 +0100, krad wrote: > I updated a production box at work last night from freebsd 6.2 to 8-stable, > via 7-stable. The upgrade went ok just a minor glitch in jumping from 7 to > 8. Basically all the device names changed from mfid0s1[a-g] to mfid0[a-g]. I > presume this is because the initial layout was in dangerously dedicated > mode. That's strange. "Dangerously" dedicated partitioning omits the slicing part, so if you had mfid0s1[a-g] in 6 and 7, there was a slice. Maybe the mfi driver is different in 8 in terms of representing the disks? > Two issues here why did the naming scheme seem to indicate a more > normal MBR disk layout in bsd 6 and 7. Very strange - if you can check booting from a live system CD or DVD with FreeBSD 6 and 7, and the disks are mfid0s1[a-g], and if you boot into FreeBSD 8, the disks are mfid0[a-g], that's really strange... > Second what is the current status of > dangerously dedicated in 8-stable as i thought support was being dropped. The support has been removed from sysinstall. You can't create dedicated partitions (without slice) with sysinstall, but you can create them manually (e. g. using bsdlabel and newfs). So support isn't dropped at all - dedicated disks just is a new special secret feature. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...