From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:27:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9CD16A469 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B9E13C457 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E002085; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:27:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D64207F; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:27:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0338F844AF; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:27:15 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Kip Macy" References: <4797B923.6030400@gmail.com> <86odbbwo02.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4798B651.7000108@samsco.org> <868x2f86pp.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:27:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Kip Macy's message of "Thu\, 24 Jan 2008 11\:15\:47 -0800") Message-ID: <86ir1j6kbh.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: EchoB , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XEN and ZFS Status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:27:25 -0000 "Kip Macy" writes: > I think Scott's irritation may stem from the fact that reality > contradicts your statements. The reality is that there is *zero* support for Xen in CVS. What is or is not in Perforce is completely irrelevant when what the OP asked about was, and I quote, "the production status of Xen and ZFS when 7.0 is released". You and Scott and many others may wish it were otherwise, but it isn't. Yelling at me and blacklisting me on your mail server won't change it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no