From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 12 00:26:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7024A16A4DD for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:26:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca (H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca [66.96.18.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0826043D46 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (desktop.home.local [172.16.0.200]) by H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE12511421; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:26:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44DD203B.3000503@rogers.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:26:35 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <20060807101946.GE33821@pasteur.fr> <44D745C0.2010803@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <44DCAD79.5060208@rogers.com> <44DCDA04.4040601@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <44DCDA04.4040601@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamToaster-Information: This messages has been scanned by SpamToaster http://www.digitalprogression.ca X-SpamToaster: Found to be clean X-SpamToaster-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.49, required 3.5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST 1.71) X-SpamToaster-From: mikej@rogers.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Dominic Marks , Jerome Sobecki , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stability of ICH7 sata on FreeBSD 6.1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:26:18 -0000 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I have same problem on ASUS RS120 with Seagate ST3250820AS/3.AAC > drives (disk loses, system reboots, slow read/write speed), but I > think this is drive problem - all drives has high > Reallocated_Sector_Ct value in SMART (above 130 reallocated sectors > after few weeks, some drives has more then 100 after few days). > Please let me now, if you also have nonzero Reallocated_Sector_Ct in > smartctl -A output. > I will test those servers with brand new Samsung drives, hope that it > helps. I don't think you have the same problem, in your case it sounds like a bad hard drive. On my servers, all the hard drives are less than two months old, and are completely error free according to SMART.