From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 01:49:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC51D16A46E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AAC13C478 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0M1ngj8045095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:49:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0M1nf27045094; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:49:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: "Kirk Davis" Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:49:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801090114.56195@aldan> <200801201706.30461@Misha> In-Reply-To: X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb) X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:49:49 -0000 On =EF=EE=ED=E5=E4=B3=EB=EE=EA 21 =F1=B3=F7=E5=ED=FC 2008, Kirk Davis wrote: =3D I don't think it is a conscious effort on anyone's part to make it =3D different, it is just a port of an older Linux version that does not yet =3D have all the newer features. Of course not. All I'm urging is a conscious effort to keep it the same... =3D The Linux way is not always the best way IMHO. =A0A lot of the features= and =3D libraries in Linux have grown out of necessity rather that good plannin= g. Agreed. But Linux is the de-facto standard. If someone like Research in Mot= ion=20 (makers of BlackBerry) or Nokia decides to release a Linux-version of the=20 software for their devices, FreeBSD better run it -- even if=20 our /alternative/ methods of talking to the same devices is better... -mi