From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 8 09:50:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF51A7D1 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [188.252.31.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D02F7C for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s289nhYa010181; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:49:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s289ngHG010178; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:49:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:49:42 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chris H Subject: Re: kern.maxswzone In-Reply-To: <725ac3a0c66351a391ec272d7676fdc5.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> Message-ID: References: <725ac3a0c66351a391ec272d7676fdc5.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 08 Mar 2014 10:49:43 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 09:50:02 -0000 > OK I'm a bit confused here. It /sounds/ like you said you put 4.7 GIGabytes > on a 512 MEGabyte hard drive. Hmm, no that can't be right. I'll bet you > meant you have a computer with 512Mb RAM, and you created a 4.7Gb slice > for SWAP. OK, that probably exceeds the traditional 2.5 x RAM I remember i just NEED 4.5GB VM. what's wrong? > it being. But still, as memory serves, the message(s) you're seeing > won't have a definitive answer without first determining how large the > "block size" is on your hard drive. While I'm inclined to think they're sector size is 512 bytes. page size 4096 - it's x86.