From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 18:47:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3806216A41F for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:47:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AE343D48 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:47:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so9870wra for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EsbN9XUYL9MYA3za7DKO8XZuUxYrsyVXP+W3He4DAYjG0y3BiNydKRU/p3tI0HlhP4RuSsU+DyjyqBhnyHgGZcVwi4T6PLaNIXmQDWCifde3JIUAya9WsirW4j6k3N+vScNRsVb8b5TeGnmmSbuUccYzSv4raP69o2PtCuLPKEE= Received: by 10.54.34.61 with SMTP id h61mr4477931wrh; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:47:41 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Dick Hoogendijk In-Reply-To: <20050816082409.GA45012@lothlorien.nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050816082409.GA45012@lothlorien.nagual.st> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: atacontrol X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:47:49 -0000 On 8/16/05, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > I have a simple question. Some time ago I was told always to use the > same type of harddisk transfers. Now I have i.e.: >=20 > Master =3D UDMA100 > Slave =3D UDMA66 >=20 > Does this mean the first disk really works on UDMA100 or is is delayed > by the second one (as I was told some time ago). >=20 > Or is the fbsd ata controller capable of setting each drive to its > right speed? AFAIK everything slows down. This is a hardware problem and FreeBSD can do nothing about it. This is why I only put one device on a controller/channel, I also do it because the controller can only talk to one device at a time.