Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:32:22 -0700
From:      Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>
To:        "O. Hartmann" <o.hartmann@walstatt.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending
Message-ID:  <8e1d558c-44e9-43cf-8894-cb2f8f1bb1a1@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170118162051.17c9b88b@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de>
References:  <30f21c75-d3a2-edcd-1999-d5ed9f970c06@freebsd.org> <20170118083400.11156f23@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <eba93bf8-2acf-d7bc-0192-10e75b7b993b@freebsd.org> <1abc7c08-8664-a22e-dcab-fa884acbfce9@freebsd.org> <20170118162051.17c9b88b@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--QEKdCPF5xcRsM1JnBs5cOfpikdW2c2R0V
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MoDq6UoRAvs5Af2A84VqGLgrMGxh91i0X";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>
To: "O. Hartmann" <o.hartmann@walstatt.org>
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <8e1d558c-44e9-43cf-8894-cb2f8f1bb1a1@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb
 pending
References: <30f21c75-d3a2-edcd-1999-d5ed9f970c06@freebsd.org>
 <20170118083400.11156f23@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de>
 <eba93bf8-2acf-d7bc-0192-10e75b7b993b@freebsd.org>
 <1abc7c08-8664-a22e-dcab-fa884acbfce9@freebsd.org>
 <20170118162051.17c9b88b@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de>
In-Reply-To: <20170118162051.17c9b88b@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de>

--MoDq6UoRAvs5Af2A84VqGLgrMGxh91i0X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 01/18/17 08:20, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:59:17 -0700
> Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>> On 01/18/17 07:41, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/18/17 00:34, O. Hartmann wrote: =20
>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:17:56 -0700
>>>> Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote: =20
>>>>> =20
>>>> On a Fujitsu Celsius M740, the "em0" device gets stuck on heavy I/O.=
 I can
>>>> still trigger this behaviour on recent CURRENT (12.0-CURRENT #17 r31=
2369:
>>>> Wed Jan 18 06:18:45 CET 2017 amd64) by rsync'ing a large poudriere p=
orts
>>>> repository onto a remote NFSv4 fileserver. The freeze always occur o=
n large
>>>> tarballs.
>>>>
>>>> Again, here is the pciconf output of the device:=20
>>>>
>>>> em0@pci0:0:25:0:        class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x11ed1734 chip=3D0x=
153a8086
>>>> rev=3D0x05 hdr=3D0x00 vendor     =3D 'Intel Corporation'
>>>>     device     =3D 'Ethernet Connection I217-LM'
>>>>     class      =3D network
>>>>     subclass   =3D ethernet
>>>>     bar   [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfb300000, size 1310=
72,
>>>> enabled bar   [14] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xfb339000, size =
4096,
>>>> enabled bar   [18] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xf020, size 32=
, enabled
>>>>
>>>> On another box. equipted with a dual-port Intel i350 NIC, the igb0 a=
nd
>>>> igb1 do have negotiation problems with several types of switches (in=
 my
>>>> SoHo environment, I use a Netgear GS110TP, at work there are several=
 types
>>>> of Cisco Catalyst 3XXX types). The igbX very often fall back to 100M=
Bit/s.
>>>>
>>>> Since yesterday, the igbX on that specific i350 basesd NIC (we have =
plentz
>>>> of them and they show similar phenomena with FreeBSD), although the =
switch
>>>> reports an uplink with 1 GBit, FreeBSD CURRENT shows this weird crap=

>>>> message:=20
>>>>> igb0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0=
 mtu
>>>>> 1500
>>>>> options=3D653dbb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VL=
AN_HWCSUM,TSO4,LRO,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO=
,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
>>>>> ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx inet 192.168.0.111 netmask 0xffffff00 broad=
cast
>>>>> 192.168.0.255 nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL=
>
>>>>>        media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>>>>>        status: active =20
>>>> =20
>>
>> I just checked my test machines (which are auto/auto on the Juniper
>> EX4200 switches in use) and I see them come up with 1000baseTX.  Do yo=
u
>> set any options in /etc/rc.conf?
>>
>> sean
>>
>=20
> No, I don't.
>=20
> The line is:
> ifconfig_igb0=3D"inet 192.168.0.10 netmask 0xffffff00"
>=20
> Nothing else.
>=20

Ok, good.  Definitely a regression.

sean


--MoDq6UoRAvs5Af2A84VqGLgrMGxh91i0X--

--QEKdCPF5xcRsM1JnBs5cOfpikdW2c2R0V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=92XH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QEKdCPF5xcRsM1JnBs5cOfpikdW2c2R0V--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e1d558c-44e9-43cf-8894-cb2f8f1bb1a1>