From owner-cvs-all Wed Dec 16 22:41:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA12968 for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 22:41:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA12879 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 22:41:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id HAA17608; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 07:40:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Bruce Evans Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hiding symbols References: <199812170603.RAA25943@godzilla.zeta.org.au> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 17 Dec 1998 07:40:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: Bruce Evans's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 1998 17:03:31 +1100" Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Bruce Evans writes: > > How can I hide these symbols so they don't pollute the consumer's > > namespace? > Don't hide symbols. It breaks debugging. Just give them a name in > the implementation namespace. That is, throw in an underscore in front? (Hmm, where are those namespaces defined in the standard? The only reference I can find in the index is to section 6.1.2.3 which is about labels, structure tags, structure members and other identifiers having separate namespaces) DES (Eivind, are you reading this? :) -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message