From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 24 09:30:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B2416A420; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C4843D46; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:30:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1O9UtQ0067303; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:30:55 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:30:53 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org> <200602201721.50781.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602240630.53797.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/93422: Re: ipfw divert rule X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:30:57 -0000 On Tuesday 21 February 2006 02:50, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > joao> same reason why "... pipe proto ip in|out" does not pipe any more, > right? > > Yes. > in addition to our "proto" talk. omitting "proto" in the rule the rule as in ipfw add deny dst-ip ${IP} recv ${NIC} works, but this ipfw add deny proto ip dst-ip ${IP} recv ${NIC} does not so would something as ipfw add 1000 divert 8669 dst-ip 0.0.0.0 src-ip 0.0.0.0 work than?=20 How should I rewrite my rules or better regressing to the old "ip from any = to=20 any" ? thank's Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br