From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 15:06:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E067437B401 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B5E43FB1 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown[12.242.158.67]) by attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <2003052222064900100ruhlte>; Thu, 22 May 2003 22:06:49 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h4MM7sKc051073; Thu, 22 May 2003 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h4MM7gKs051072; Thu, 22 May 2003 15:07:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jojo set sender to swear@attbi.com using -f To: Stephen McKay References: <20030520203225.GA30587@thyrsus.com> <200305221613.h4MGDNLR016491@dungeon.home> From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: 22 May 2003 15:07:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200305221613.h4MGDNLR016491@dungeon.home> Message-ID: <2qel2qski9.l2q@localhost.localdomain> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: grammar (was Re: Fwd: ESR/OSI's Unix/Linux-history-laden treatise on SCO vs. IBM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 22:06:51 -0000 > >You, not "y'all". Please. > > No! No! It is merely artistic flair! Not "merely", but yeah, I find "you all" too stilted or something. I think that the Southernism should be acceptable in informal writing, to avoid the need to make the sentence longer with extra words that would tend to detract from the point being made. "You" wouldn't have worked because it was ambiguous. The alternative was probably something like "you and your fellow copyleftists". But it seems that the contraction detracts from the point too, in some minds. Hmmmm.