From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 05:10:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AD516A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 05:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub2.midco.net (mailhub2.midco.net [24.220.0.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1515443D2F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 05:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 12402 invoked by uid 0); 10 Feb 2004 13:10:03 -0000 Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net) ([24.220.219.195]) (envelope-sender ) by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Feb 2004 13:10:03 -0000 Message-ID: <4028D82A.7060102@bis.midco.net> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:10:02 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040209 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jake Khuon References: <200402101256.i1ACuYPM016374@Espresso.NEEBU.Net> In-Reply-To: <200402101256.i1ACuYPM016374@Espresso.NEEBU.Net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: afraid of portupgrade -ra X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:10:09 -0000 Jake Khuon wrote: > I have not done a cvsup and buildworld since the threading move in the ports > tree was made. Is it okay for me to do a cvsup and buildworld WITHOUT doing > a portupgrade -ra? Will I break any of my existing applications? The > reason I ask is because on my laptop, I've installed a lot of ports... as in > somewhere around 6500. While I typically install only what I need, my > philosophy with my laptop was that I also typically end up in situations > where I'll need something and not have the connectivity to download a > package or grab the ports source to compile. So now I'm faced with having > my machine crunch through quite a few ports... not all of which I'm > confident will build correctly. > > First, you'll want `portupgrade -raf'. Second, it might be better to just start over anew. Blowing everything away and starting fresh with the latest JPSNAP has given me excellent results. Of course, I have a desktop with multiple hard drives. If this stuff freaks you out, don't run -current. Especially on a machine you'll need to have working! ;-) Pete...