From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org Mon May 27 12:51:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710D9158154E for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FFA6BC9B for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B78B1158154D; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EFB158154C for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BAF56BC90 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0E81D91B for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4RCpVMW064448 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4RCpVpm064444 for java@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237054] java/openjdk11: Needs to be integrated into bsd.java.mk Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tommyhp2@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 12:51:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237054 --- Comment #26 from Tommy P --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #25) I'm not confused about OpenJDK vs Oracle JDK vs Oracle OpenJDK. Like I said before about nothing concrete on OpenJDK' EOL. The link you've cited states only the transfer of stewardship from Oracle to Red Hat. I think we should stop here since I don't think this is the right platform for lengthy discussions about which version is better and SDLC's best practices. The main goals of my proposed patch are: 1) Specific version usage for different use cases I've mentioned previously similar to OpenSSL 2) Added versions 11 & 12 for the pioneers 3) The default version is for those taking the minimalist configuration / customization approach. Thus, regardless of whichever version the porting team decides to use as default, the patch would provide anyone the freedom to choose for her/his scenarios. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=