From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 10:10:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF10037B404 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7022F43FB1 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h46HARm2037436; Tue, 6 May 2003 10:10:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h46HAMRi037431; Tue, 6 May 2003 10:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 10:10:22 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Message-ID: <20030506171022.GD37180@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , current@freebsd.org References: <20030505094607.GA90653@droso.net> <20030506163114.GA36798@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld b?rkedinlibpam X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 17:10:38 -0000 On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 06:56:12PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > I am seeing this on more than one machine also (in fact it is preventing > > the Alpha 5.1 BETA snapshot from being built). > > I have CVSup'ed and 'cvs up'ed many times. > > Am I correct in guessing that those are all systems that previously > didn't have Kerberos, but are building it now that the knob has been > inverted? Correct. > Do those systems have *complete* and *clean* source trees, including > the Kerberos sources? Yes, as far as I can tell. > I just don't understand what else could be wrong - the tinderboxen all > build fine, and I just checked that the prebuild_libs ordering is > correct; it builds all the Kerberos libraries before building libpam. > > Can you give me shell access on one of the affected systems? That would be hard to do. I'll see if it could be possible. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)