From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 22 13:13:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B911F1559D for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4281C1F; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 04:12:43 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Chris Piazza Cc: Kenneth Wayne Culver , Mike Smith , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc back? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:02:42 MST." <19990822130242.A23957@norn.ca.eu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 04:12:43 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19990822201243.CA4281C1F@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Chris Piazza wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 03:07:44PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > > > I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that > > > > gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to > > > > keep gcc in the source now. > > > > > > If you are tracking -current, you should be reading the commit messages. > > > > > > egcs has become gcc. > > > > I must have accidentally missed that one. Especially since egcs is still > > in my source tree after cvsupping. > > There wasn't one. At least not here. I remember when egcs was imported > it was the same thing. Don't sweat, it's just been "un-deleted". David will be doing the transition over the next week or so via several steps so we don't loose history. Give him a bit of room to move while doing it, it's quite fiddly. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message