From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 24 02:15:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA27997 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 02:15:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-23.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA27985 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 02:15:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id CAA26769; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 02:15:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 02:15:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199712241015.CAA26769@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: andreas@wup.de CC: garbanzo@hooked.net, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19971223141928.48178@wup.de> (message from Andreas Klemm on Tue, 23 Dec 1997 14:19:28 +0100) Subject: Re: pgcc ports From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Should I remove pgcc completely ? * We could try to make a new port egcs ... I think those people * make the most success ... * I think we can avoid a repository copy from pgcc-current for egcs, * since it's a new port. I'd prefer to do a repository copy, just to keep the pgcc's history in some place. So please drop me a line before you want to commit egcs. Satoshi