From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 21:46:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970C3106564A for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout1.easydns.com [205.210.42.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C56A8FC19 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from lilypad.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F56348517 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:44:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by lilypad.shadypond.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C99CBB81F for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:46:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:45:55 +0000 References: <47FBE451.3070202@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <47FBE451.3070202@optonline.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804082145.57955.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: Why are some linux users saying that FreeBSD is dying X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:46:18 -0000 On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote: > "FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it" that's the > argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they > using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the > uptimes section I can see quite a few running FreeBSD and not one linux! > Is the data from netcraft reliable? I think perhaps the Linux users who say those things are just trying to get people to use Linux, for political reasons and not because Linux is necessarily "better".