From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 06:50:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0051B16A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:50:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A3C43D45 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1E6oBvD076327 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:50:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1E6oB5r076326; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:50:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:50:11 GMT Message-Id: <200502140650.j1E6oB5r076326@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: bin/76089: The "-n" option in /usr/bin/w is broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Matveychuk List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:50:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/76089; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Matveychuk To: Peter Jeremy Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, jesper@hackunite.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/76089: The "-n" option in /usr/bin/w is broken Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:45:44 +0300 Peter Jeremy wrote: > Depending on the environment, the IP address may be more changeable > than the hostname. Definitely, in a DHCP or dialup environment, you > can't rely on the IP address at any time other than during the > session. There is little (if any) benefit in logging the IP address > instead of the hostname. I agree, environments are different. So may be it makes no sense to change hostname with IP. It was just an idea. But fact is, we lost 'w -n' semantic. And it should be fixed. BTW, UT_HOSTSIZE=16 is too short in my opinion. -- Sem.