From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 8 21:14:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F7216A420 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:14:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FF243D76 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i29so222826wxd for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:14:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZBEQAn53ZE2meErFq9z/ItDtJb46nELdfwzlV2dGFFwvqS8FpKSVX28EzOGMKGHNomtyCUmZfbjgtAuJXWRBj/vx5qOhdvQZwRwCy0EkJJPiPTJPOW6TUU6if9+SPKWG9LEit8hcPwP8Z7/5e/Gdxg3HjZYNOoY9HJ5GDKQvVXU= Received: by 10.70.71.11 with SMTP id t11mr1436775wxa; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.31.17 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:14:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <790a9fff0603081314j7071b433s11fd6415874f51c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:14:20 -0600 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Michael Nottebrock" In-Reply-To: <440F434C.3070702@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <790a9fff0603080801t140fb323kc4ddecfb85d00ecc@mail.gmail.com> <440F434C.3070702@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] sysutils/kdeadmin3: kpackage using wrong INDEX file X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:14:27 -0000 On 3/8/06, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > I'm curious - how and for what are you using kpackage at all? The BSD > package management functions are rudimentary at best, and I've debated > completely disabling it in the kdeadmin port multiple times. > Since I had a fresh install of KDE on the system, I was going thru the installed KDE applicaions to see what they were like. When I came=20 across kpackage, I saw that it listed the installed ports, and their version status. I don't plan to use it to manage the installed ports. > Also, it's possible now to move ${INDEXFILE} out of ${PORTSDIR} > completely, which would require even more upstream maintenance to > make kpackage properly cope. I saw that in the kpackage options, and while I had a quick look at kpackage/fbsdInterface.cpp, I wasn't sure where to patch a fix for it. My best guess is that "INDEX" should be replaced by ${INDEXFILE} in that fi= le. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.