From owner-freebsd-net Wed Feb 6 10:50:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from soso.eecs.umich.edu (soso.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D31337B420 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:50:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from soso.eecs.umich.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by soso.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g16IoWHN003437 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:50:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (binkertn@localhost) by soso.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) with ESMTP id g16IoU4T003434 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:50:32 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: soso.eecs.umich.edu: binkertn owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:50:30 -0500 (EST) From: Nathan Binkert X-X-Sender: To: Subject: em vs. gx Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What are the various opinions of em vs. gx? Has anyone done a thorough comparison of the two? Which is expected to have better support in the future? Thanks, Nathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message