From owner-freebsd-chat Sun May 9 21:35: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wolves.k12.mo.us (mail.wolves.k12.mo.us [207.160.214.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210FC14F33 for ; Sun, 9 May 1999 21:35:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us) Received: from mail.wolves.k12.mo.us (cdillon@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us [207.160.214.1]) by mail.wolves.k12.mo.us (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA08030; Sun, 9 May 1999 23:34:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us) Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 23:34:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris Dillon To: John Baldwin Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Server Uptimes project... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 10 May 1999, John Baldwin wrote: > On the soapbox... > > A while back someone announced the "Server Uptimes" page at > http://uptime.hexon.cx. In fact, for a while some FreeBSD user was reporting > an erroneous uptime of 10000 days. Anyways, as far as number of hosts > registered, FreeBSD is 4th with 43 behind Linux with 300+, NT with 47, and > Win98 with 45. All we need is five more machines to be in second there. I've got a 2.2.6-BETA (don't ask) box I set up for a client that will be up for almost 400 days soon, but it doesn't have Internet access... I wonder if a scanned Polaroid of a telnet session from a Win95 box (it's headless) on its local network would be sufficient proof. :-) -- Chris Dillon - cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us - cdillon@inter-linc.net FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet. For Intel x86 and Alpha architectures (SPARC under development). ( http://www.freebsd.org ) "One should admire Windows users. It takes a great deal of courage to trust Windows with your data." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message