From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 23 13:22:26 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5F0106567F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd06+2B=235abae4@mlists.homeunix.com)
Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949FF8FC14
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd06+2B=235abae4@mlists.homeunix.com)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7613623E4BA
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:22:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:22:23 +0100
From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20080923142223.0016c952@gumby.homeunix.com.>
In-Reply-To: <20080923133935.2523d8de@gumby.homeunix.com.>
References: <18648.30321.369520.631459@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
	<BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCAEOKCFAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
	<20080923133935.2523d8de@gumby.homeunix.com.>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: using /dev/random
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:22:26 -0000

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:39:35 +0100
RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:51:02 -0700
> "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> wrote:
 
> > If you really want to roll-your-own and not use these functions
> > then you could read blocks from /dev/random and run
> > a Chi-square and Monte Carlo test on each
> > block and discard the ones that don't pass.
> > 
> > I've done my experimenting with the ENT program:
> > 
> > http://www.fourmilab.ch/random/
> 
> I'm sceptical about this, if Rijndael in counter-mode produced output
> that's distinguishable from random numbers over a few thousand bytes
> it would surely never have made it into the AES competition, let
> alone win it. 

I tried it myself (the windows binary runs under wine), it looks OK to
me, they look like normal statistical fluctuations. You need to worry
of they are consistently low or high, or if you *never* get extreme
values. 

Discarding the blocks that don't "pass" would produce less random
numbers, not better.