Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 16:31:49 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: nate@mt.sri.com Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, darrylo@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com, questions@freefall.freebsd.org, me@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions-digest V1 #1174 Message-ID: <199607312331.QAA21986@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199607312324.RAA04427@rocky.mt.sri.com> (message from Nate Williams on Wed, 31 Jul 1996 17:24:19 -0600 (MDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Agreed, but that is the current state of the xemacs package
* unfortunately. :(
Sorry about that. I'll make sure to look out for such things (a port
that doesn't "require" Motif inadvertently picking it up) for future
releases.
* The 'Motif' version looks better. But, functionally they are the same.
^^^^^^
Even with the 3-D Athena widget? :)
* What's the size difference in the binary of a 'static Motif' binary
* vs. a 'non-Motif' binary? (Unfortunately, I don't have Motif or I'd do
* the comparison myself, or at least build a local package that uses
* Motif. :(
Unfortunately I can't either, as somebody seems to have erased Motif
from thud. Jordan, can you reinstall it please?
Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607312331.QAA21986>