From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  8 03:11:47 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD42FD9E;
 Tue,  8 Oct 2013 03:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACCD52B69;
 Tue,  8 Oct 2013 03:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y13so8144568pdi.33
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
 bh=MpzW1/hMQChhcxLDecpWyqj/+L22nWQbMOBoGTftpsQ=;
 b=kj3OypvPB5e+2AYvNS1Sbe5USUwKUf6kd+kP+fXHBAZHnHCtEGzYy8XWPVEEOFmtbQ
 P4svmhEzZCswERCxXae+RjfQM7622lDlet1+0uIxB/82Q+7r/p3Vf8lmE4KFh2NnoLhG
 PGJUgTTV1nGQJeUuLPN1CV7lVPkL5VhtxkwpVxbOwUqE4MoTm7XecSDZSu50joAB2tx0
 0VCh2Cfbd2/d+pAOccwX53wCyrv9SaWHobKyASuVuOnWFUzsfOl4XwyLEL7ulcj5jTCR
 ugjLyIt3Kv8S3zuFuixspiKM0k/Lr7iMu4E0qf4k45t6HGrckw+Wk/K3khQTzPkIdusv
 4YLA==
X-Received: by 10.66.234.131 with SMTP id ue3mr836706pac.35.1381201907350;
 Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (c-76-21-78-151.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [76.21.78.151])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 ye1sm43451554pab.19.1969.12.31.16.00.00
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:12:25 -0700
From: Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com>
To: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT
Message-ID: <20131008031225.GA1320@reks>
References: <20131007163111.GB1590@reks.swifttest.com>
 <20131007231734.GY56872@funkthat.com>
 <CADDB7yFR-s2PExPCru2H9TM+gfi6LoV0XygPGR=NH+xir=bBOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131008002314.GA56872@funkthat.com>
 <CADDB7yFsCfBpVvV4ew866ANr_=CpjENmjen2Oakm5wbmwZ0cQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131008012451.GE56872@funkthat.com>
 <CADDB7yFEyOACcw5kHyOX5ZUhCvB4as-xGNmmUg8nE_LmWDhiJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKYr3zx6g5UVW1qUQsu==b=-UpftCo15FTm4BQf7sMasmjnZtA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKYr3zx6g5UVW1qUQsu==b=-UpftCo15FTm4BQf7sMasmjnZtA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
 "delphij@freebsd.org" <delphij@freebsd.org>, Kris Moore <kris@pcbsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 03:11:47 -0000

On (07/10/2013 21:59), Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over?  What
> > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we have
> > > to live w/ the code?
> >
> > I still hope not to get hit by bus any time soon..
> >
> 
> on a side note, i applied the patch to stable/9 out of curiosity and the
> kernel failed to build the module
> however i could install fine from ports.

Correct, there is no support for old kernels in the patch.
Port will be maintained and will provide support for older versions in
case PEFS finds its way to 10.0.